Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation
  • Already a member? Click here to login

Welcome to Discussion Bucks

Earn Cash While You Engage!

Join the ultimate paid-to-post forum where your opinions earn you real cash! 🌟 💵 Earn While You Post: Share your thoughts and watch your earnings grow. 🌐 Global Community: Connect with members worldwide. 🎁 Exclusive Perks: Enjoy rewards and VIP perks. Get Started in Minutes!

SignUp Now!

Does Scientific Advancement Reduce the Need for Philosophy?

Joined
Jan 13, 2024
Messages
777
Reaction score
44
Trophy Points
0
D Bucks
💵0.199400
Referral Credit
0
Many argue that advances in science and technology are progressively resolving questions that previously belonged to philosophy. With physics, biology and neuroscience advancing rapidly, does philosophy still have an essential role to play in understanding reality? On the one hand, science offers concrete answers to questions about the universe and the human mind, but on the other, ethical, existential and meaning-of-life questions remain areas where philosophy has greater relevance. Is philosophy a complementary field to science or will it eventually be replaced by it?
 
It is absolutely true that science actually demystified a lot of things philosophers have been debating since ages. Science have done pretty well but it does not displace philosophy as a study. Philosophy is still more relevant today than ever.
 
Back
Top Bottom